Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR9359 14
Original file (NR9359 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
SAARTD FOR CORRECTION OF WAS F CcCOPRTS
7 > pin PMU >e OAs SULT 1
ARLINGTON, VA 22204 490

 

 

 

14
al Re
This is in reference to your application for correction of your

naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10, United
States Code, Section 1552.

BR three-member panel of rhe Board for Correc
Records, sitting in executive session, consi
application on 19 November 2014. The names and votes Of the
members of the panel will be furnished upon request. Your

allegations of error and injustice were reviewed i
with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by

the Board consisted of your application, together with all

   

material submitted 1n support thereof, your naval record ana
applicable statutes, regulations, Le In addition, the
Board considered tne attached adv nished by
Headquarters Marine Corps, COPt ached for your
information.

after careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board Found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice. In this regard, the Board substantially
concurred with the comments contained in the advisory opinions

jingly, your application nas been denied.
ying for @ correction of an official naval
licant to jcqemeeete the

Yyror or injustice.

Y. we
My Ker wnw oe
O 2 SBERT g. 0’ OMEILL
Feecutive Director

Consequently, when apply
record, the burden is on the app
existence of probable material e

Enclosures

y

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02408-02

    Original file (02408-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 April 2002. The Board thus concluded that there is no error or injustice in your reenlistment code. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 09590-06

    Original file (09590-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE N VYBOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVA RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-51 0DJCDocket No. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished y Memo of 1 Dec 06, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 07228-98

    Original file (07228-98.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NAVCRUTCOM memorandum 1133 SER 1998, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 03577-99

    Original file (03577-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 August 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 00705-03

    Original file (00705-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 April 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 02707-99

    Original file (02707-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 August 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3348 14

    Original file (NR3348 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 November 2014. your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and revcedures applicable to the proceedings oF 8» Board. New evidence is evidence the Board prior to making its decision ep in mind that you are entitl reconsider its year from the date of the Bo not previously considered by in this case. rrection...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | 07937-98

    Original file (07937-98.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Per reference (a) , OSVETS will be enlisted in paygrade E-1 unless they meet reference (b) criteria for enlistment in...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 03715-99

    Original file (03715-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 August 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08735-01

    Original file (08735-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 April 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...